"The
Cancer Cure That Worked: The Rife Report"
The
newspaper article discussed here was included in a
newspaper called "The Planet" and was published April 1987 in
Washington, D.C.. It was delivered to every member of the U.S.
House of Representatives and every member of the United States
Senate. Not one representative, senator, or staff assistant was
motivated sufficiently to investigate further.
The
newspaper was also provided free to the George Washington
University Medical
School
students and professors. Again, not one was motivated to
investigate further. All while 7,000 to 10,000 Americans died
weekly from cancer. Good examples of public irresponsibility
from people in positions of public trust or professions with
public trust implied!
Barry
Lynes September 25, 1999
The Cancer Cure That Worked: The
Rife Report
was published in April
1987, 14 months after the U.S. Congress turned its back on Rife
and ignored an incredible opportunity to "jump start" the Rife
revival.
It has been a secret for many
years --more than 50 years in fact. It is a secret that is a
shame of the medical profession and another example of
complacent press, another example of a scientific conspiracy
that resembles more a medieval guild protecting its financial
interests than a profession dedicated to public service, and
another example of a political system afraid to promote the
public good when it clashed with powerful elites.
This story also demonstrates how
apathetic, asleep, cowardly and unwilling so many individuals,
especially the self-righteous "new agers," actually are when
given the opportunity to take real initiatives which could
rectify monstrous wrongs.
The secret is the cancer cure.
Before detailing this fundamental
wrong, it is important to emphasize what 50 years of covering up
a cancer cure has meant in terms of suffering. Almost every
family in America has been touched by the horror of lingering
deaths by cancer. Those who haven't been directly affected have
known neighbors and friends who have been the victims of both
the disease and the arrogant scientists, government bureaucrats
and financial elites who are responsible. Children have been
among the many millions who have not only been abandoned to
cancer's excruciating pain and protracted terror, but to
existing, stupid, torturous, experimental procedures which don't
work. In a word, the American medical and political
"establishment" are guilty of gross misconduct.
Our nation is premised upon
democratic procedures, checks and balances, competition, and the
correction of abuses through open discussion which lead to
institutional change. In the matter of this 50 year old cancer
cure, all of the above have not worked. The cancer cure was
suppressed. Agencies, both public and private, were not
responsive.
The cost in human lives and wasted
resources has been staggering. A Vietnam War, the
countless annual deaths in automobile accidents, or the lives
prematurely ended because of inferior nutrition caused by
poverty together cannot match the number who have died horribly
because America's culture could not expose and then break the
vested interests which perpetrated this crime. And if Colorado
Governor Lamm's figures are correct, one-third of Americans now
living will die of cancer in the future. So perhaps finally -~
if enough of us insist on it -- America's institutional ability
to correct this outrage can be demonstrated. But don't hold your
breath. Without a major, on-going, public commitment and a
national authority to oversee the effort and report regularly on
the progress being. made, it is unlikely that swift, significant
remedies will occur.
In another article in this issue
(The Timid Press, Page 1), syndicated columnist Mary McGrory's
acceptance speech upon receiving the Lovejoy journalism award is
reported. In that talk, Ms. McGrory advocated that readers read
their papers "with the idea of doing something." In a similar
vein, the article on the changing weather and the scientific
cover up involved, science philosopher Paul Feyerabend is quoted
when he calls for "duly elected committees of laymen" to judge
the efforts and recommendations of scientists.
Certainly, if anything deserves
both the individual reader's commitment as well as participation
in oversight committees, it is the investigation into this
cancer cure and the development of procedures to bring this
cancer cure into practical use as fast as possible.
This story is somewhat technical,
but the complicated scientific details will be omitted in order
that you, the reader, can grasp the essentials. The specifics
can be checked elsewhere and it is hoped that enough of you
--including experts capable of initiating action will do so. A
mobilization is required, for not only cancer, but AIDS and many
other diseases threatening us are potentially capable of being
eradicated if we, the people of the United States, get off our
collective asses.
|
|
|
Royal Rife in his
Lab, 1929 |
In the 1920s a scientist-inventor
named Royal Raymond Rife invented a new kind of microscope. In
an article New Age Journal March produced little from New
readers, the story of Rife's cancer cure was detailed. Since
then, Rife has been nominated for the "Alternative Nobel Prize"
which is annually awarded in Europe as a protest to the more
established, less risk taking Swedish honor. Yet, little notice
of Rife and his miraculous discovery has infiltrated the
establishment's consciousness.
Rife's microscope was a stunning
advance. Unlike the electron microscope, Rife's microscope made
it possible to study "living" bacteria, viruses, and so forth.
An electron microscope kills its specimens. Rife's remarkable
breakthrough used a new approach to bend light. As a result,
Rife was able to prove that bacteria could change their form. In
effect, they could become cancer causing viruses.
Rife then implanted his
cancer-causing bacteria into rats. Tumors subsequently
developed. From here, Rife made the startling discovery that the
bacteria could change into a completely different form if the
"medium on which they were living" was slightly altered. In
other words, Rife's cancer causing substance was, in some forms
and in association with some environments within the body,
deadly. But in other forms and in other environments, benign.
His cancer causing substance could be changed back and forth
from one to the other. The implications of this discovery are
obvious.
Cancer cells might be
transformed to healthy cells again!
Rife then began beaming different
frequencies of light on these microorganisms. Up until the early
1950s, Rife perfected this method. As Christopher Bird reported
in the New Age article, "many lethal those of tuberculosis,
typhoid, leprosy . . . appeared to disintegrate or 'bIow up' in
the field of his microscope." This "death ray" was applied
to cancers in rats.
It worked!
The next step was humans. The
result? Here is Rife's report: "The first clinical work on
cancer was completed under the supervision of Milbank Johnson,
M.D., which was setup under a special medical research committee
of the University of Southern California. Sixteen cases were
treated at the clinic for many types of malignancy. After three
months, fourteen of these so-called hopeless cases were signed
off as clinically cured by a staff of medical doctors and Alvin
G. Ford, M. D., pathologist for the group.
Throughout the 1930's, Rife and
associates continued their work. In 1940, Arthur W. Yale, M.D.
reported that Rife's discoveries were an entirely new theory of
the origin and cause of cancer, and the treatment and results
have been so unique and unbelievable" that we' may be able to
"eliminate the second largest cause of deaths in the United
States."
But it was not to be!
There were powerful doctors whose
careers were based on the theory that bacteria could not change
its form. Rife's discovery threatened their status and their own
research. (It was like the invention of the automobile for a
horse-drawn carriage driver.)
One of these "authorities" was Dr.
Thomas Rivers of the Rockefeller Institute. Another was Harvard
microbiologist Dr. Hans Zinsser. The cancer cure was killed by
the powerful.
One of Rife's supporters, Dr.
Edward C. Rosenow, a pioneer bacteriologist, sadly commented at
the end of his life, "They simply won't listen."
Others have followed Rife and have
confirmed different aspects of his theory, but since they are
few in number and are promoting a cause contrary to the medical
establishment's approved philosophy, they are not supported.
Even publishing their findings is difficult if not impossible
because of the dominant medical orthodoxy which has reigned
since the 1930s!
Christopher Bird's 1976' New
Age Journal article contained a summation of the political
cover up as perceived by the Lee Foundation of Nutritional
Research in Milwaukee. According to Bird, the Lee Foundation
"maintains that Rife, his microscope and his life work were
tabooed by leaders in the U.S. medical profession and that any
medical doctor who made use of his practical discoveries was
stripped of his privileges as a member of the local medical
society."
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) still bans treatments similar to those of Rife.
And how many millions of dollars
are annually "invested" in the establishment's preferred
quackery and torturous gimmicks?
Those interested in pursuing this
matter, which as a first step means forming a national committee
of scientists, administrators, "can-do-types" and laymen to
monitor and correct this crime are encouraged to contact The
Planet. Perhaps citizen action is not entirely dead in this
country yet.
Or have we truly lost our nerve,
our fighting spirit, and our 1776 contempt for aristrocracy
assuming dictatorial rights over our bodies and minds?
-
Barry Lynes