What is a
Frequency Generator?
A frequency generator is a research
instrument used by
practitioners, clinical
researchers, and private
researchers
alike, in an attempt to
influence the body in making
chemical changes.
Frequency
generators work on the principle
of sympathetic resonance, which
states that if there are two
similar objects and one of them
is vibrating, the other will
begin to vibrate as well, even
if they are not touching. In the
same way that a sound wave can
induce resonance in a crystal
glass, and ultra-sound can be
used to break up kidney stones,
it is believed by many doctors
and researchers that frequencies
can be
generated, using sympathetic
resonance to stimulate organ
function or physically vibrate
offending bacteria, viruses and
parasites, resulting in their elimination from
the body.
The first modern
publication on the subject of
bio-frequencies
(that this author is aware of)
was by
Nikola Tesla in 1890.
Later, in the 1920's and 30's,
Raymond Royal Rife
is the man who began exploring
this
phenomena as it relates to people and
the pathogens that make us ill. He
built a wonderous microscope
that used light
to actually see these microscopic invaders
with his own eyes. He watched, while
applying sound in the radio
frequency range in an attempt to create a
sympathetic resonance for each
sample. Later,
in the 1990's cellular physicist,
Hulda Clark PhD, also
applied this science to uncover
and "map out" the unique
bio-frequencies generated by
hundreds of parasites and
bacteria that she found inside our bodies.
Rather than light, she uncovered
these frequencies by sound,
by using a "listening device" of her own
design. (The Syncrometer) Her work
helped to further
support the validity of applied
bio-resonance science.
Analog vs. Digital
The question always arises about
the type of signal that
should be
used.
It is generally accepted that the most effective of these
frequency generating devices
will deliver an analog signal,
versus a digital signal. Analog is better
because it is in many ways a
more natural frequency. It
includes the sub-tones and
overtones to the base
number, providing a maximized
fullness, essentially a richness
of tonal qualities. A very big
part of that is what is called
the harmonics. An audiophile
understands this. Those who
desire only "true" sound on
their stereo systems insist on
analog devices for just this
reason.
The current analog vs. digital
discussion is wrought with
misconceptions and
disinformation. Such as,
digitally generated frequencies
do not vary, which implies that
they do not have overtones and
undertones. This would only be
true if the frequencies remained
digital. That is why digital
frequencies from DDS (Direct
Digital Synthesis) and DSP
(Digital Signal Processing) are
converted to analog before they
are put out of quality
generators. These
Digital-to-Analog Converters are
called a DAC for short. You can
see in the diagram below that a
frequency comes out of a DDS or
a DSP looking like stairs. The
signal then goes through a DAC
or Digital-to-Analog Converter.
Then it goes through a Low-Pass
or Bandpass Filter to finish the
analog conversion. Now the
frequency that you have is a
very accurate analog frequency
with all the overtones and
undertones of that analog
frequency. The analog frequency
produced by a digital chip can
be swept up or down with more
accuracy than any old tube
analog instrument. The most
important thing to remember is
the frequency has to be
converted to analog before it is
output from the frequency
generator.
Digitally produced frequencies
converted to analog are far
superior to any signal that
comes from an old antique tube
type analog frequency generator.
Antique tube type generators are
very limited. If I want a
frequency of 2128.5, an old tube
analog generator would not be
accurate enough to give me that
frequency to use. It could only
give me 2128. Also, digitally
converted frequencies allow me
to sweep with far more accuracy
than old analog tube type
instruments. Even a thousandth
or millionth of a frequency is
possible even though this kind
of accuracy is not needed. This
is something that a purely
analog instrument could not do
as accurately. Digitally
produced frequencies when
converted to analog can
accurately produce minute
details. These analog
frequencies when converted to a
square wave waveform produce
square wave harmonics. Some
claim that their instruments
which output analog frequencies
produce advanced analog
harmonics, but this is just
sales hype. All the digital to
analog frequency generators on
the market today that have been
tested with a spectrum analyzer
produce the same analog
harmonics. Anyone claiming to
have some form of superior
advanced square wave harmonics
is just giving you lots of sales
hype. (Our frequency generator
uses this technology, of course.)
Audio Frequencies
vs. Radio Frequencies
In a nutshell,
Radio Frequencies are higher
than Audio Frequencies. The
science seems to say more
power and more cycles per
second (frequency) allow the
signal to penetrate more deeply.
The first known frequencies from
the 20's and 30's were in the
millions of hertz
range. So why do most of the
instruments built today only use
low audio frequencies when original frequencies were
much higher?
The FCC (Federal Communication
Commission) is the reason why.
In 1935 Congress created the FCC
and by 1936 they began to
regulate the airwaves. Before
1935 there were no regulations
to prevent Dr. Rife from using
his high frequencies output
through a ray tube. The
frequencies output through the
ray tube would travel about 12
miles in each direction from his
laboratory, and would. Dr.Rife
said his equipment would “raise the
devil” with all the radios.
In
1936, Philip Hoyland built the first audio
frequency instrument. (right) In these early
designs, a radio frequency was used to "carry" the
new lower audio frequencies into the body.
In the
1950s, Rife's research partners John Crane and
John Marsh continued to build
this lower audio frequency
instrument, using simple
off-the-shelf technology of the day. From this
time on, Dr. Rife’s original high
frequencies were no longer used
in any of the equipment, nor
were his RF carrier waves used. Most of
today’s modern
frequency generators are
patterned after these early 50's
style instruments.
Without
the RF carrier frequency, they
couldn’t get the same harmonics
and penetration as
the earlier ray tube instruments.
This is why our frequency generator does use
a RF carrier wave. A very simplified way to
think of this is this: when you hear a song on
the radio, it is audio frequencies that you
are hearing. However, these audio frequencies
are brought to your radio by a radio
frequency, or "carrier wave". The audio frequencies
are "piggy backed" onto the radio frequencies.
Square Wave vs. Sine Wave
Another debate
within this field is "which wave
format to use?" Before the newer
instruments were developed, all
the generators output only radio
frequencies, or "RF". When
emitting these radio
frequencies, the sine wave
format is produced.
Basically because this higher
frequency range (in the millions
of pulses per second, or hertz),
creates a wave form that is
naturally rounded at the top and
bottom. It's more
difficult to create very sharp
signals at this high rate of
oscillation.
With advent of
the newer Crane/Marsh design,
the rate at which these signals
are emitted dropped
substantially into what is
referred to as the Audio Frequency
range. (this was not a desired
design aspect at the time)
With these lower frequencies,
the signal can be very sharply
turned on and off, as seen below.
This square wave design is used
generally when running the lower
audio frequencies. One
important reason is because it
helps to better create
entrainment between the signal
being emitted and the target.
The principle of entrainment is
at the very foundation of this
entire science.
EASY to use.
